Operational Control for Part 91 on FAA's Radar

Business Jet Traveler » February 2008
Friday, February 1, 2008 - 4:00am

The FAA's scrutiny of Part 135 operational control has spurred an interest in operational control of Part 91 business jets. While no specific regulation requires operational control under Federal Aviation Regulation Part 91, owners are responsible for airworthiness and safety, and this implies a need for operational control, according to Mike Nichols, vice president of operations, education and economics for the National Business Aviation Association.

The issue for Part 91 operators came to light during FAA examinations of Part 135 charter companies when the agency asked aircraft owners about who had operational control over certain flights. Some owners didn't know or assumed that the Part 135 certificate holder had operational control, even over Part 91 flights. "What the FAA is saying," Nichols noted, "is that if the owner doesn't want to take control, Part 135 would be the only option." The FAA isn't going to regulate flight departments or management companies, he said, but it may take action against an owner if a flight is conducted illegally or against a management company that should be operating under Part 135 but is not.

Share this...

Add your comment:

By submitting a comment, you are allowing AIN Publications to edit and use your comment in all media.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
 

Quote/Unquote

“When you get into the larger aircraft it becomes like a hotel, with dozens of staff supporting the plane based in a galley area down below. You have very comprehensive cooking facilities, and on larger aircraft we have looked at theatres, with spiral staircases and a Steinway grand piano. The limitations for what you can put inside a plane are pretty much the limits of physics, and even money cannot always overcome that. Even so, people are still always trying to push [the limits]. ”

-Howard Guy of Design Q, a UK-based consultancy